<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A simpler Simply Google</title>
	<link>http://lloydi.com/blog/2006/04/13/simply-google-made-simpler/</link>
	<description>Nothing to do with standards, even less to do with wombats, only vaguely a blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Isus</title>
		<link>http://lloydi.com/blog/2006/04/13/simply-google-made-simpler/#comment-1952</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 00:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lloydi.com/blog/2006/04/13/simply-google-made-simpler/#comment-1952</guid>
					<description>Hi Chris,

SIMPLY GOOGLE IS FANTASTIC. CONGRATULATIONS!! I WOULD LIKE TO PUT A LINK TO YOU  IN THE SITE I AM BUILDING. CAN YOU PLEASE CHECK YOUR E-MAIL AND TELL ME WHICH LINK YOU PREFER? TO YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS OR TO USABILITY.COM.
REGARDS,

ISOLDA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris,</p>
<p>SIMPLY GOOGLE IS FANTASTIC. CONGRATULATIONS!! I WOULD LIKE TO PUT A LINK TO YOU  IN THE SITE I AM BUILDING. CAN YOU PLEASE CHECK YOUR E-MAIL AND TELL ME WHICH LINK YOU PREFER? TO YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS OR TO USABILITY.COM.<br />
REGARDS,</p>
<p>ISOLDA
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris McEvoy</title>
		<link>http://lloydi.com/blog/2006/04/13/simply-google-made-simpler/#comment-522</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 21:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lloydi.com/blog/2006/04/13/simply-google-made-simpler/#comment-522</guid>
					<description>Have you seen Simply BBC?

 http://usability.typepad.com/confusability/2006/04/getting_simple_.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you seen Simply BBC?</p>
<p> <a href='http://usability.typepad.com/confusability/2006/04/getting_simple_.html' rel='nofollow'>http://usability.typepad.com/confusability/2006/04/getting_simple_.html</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ivan Minic</title>
		<link>http://lloydi.com/blog/2006/04/13/simply-google-made-simpler/#comment-496</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2006 16:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lloydi.com/blog/2006/04/13/simply-google-made-simpler/#comment-496</guid>
					<description>Brilliant job</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant job
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mr. wade</title>
		<link>http://lloydi.com/blog/2006/04/13/simply-google-made-simpler/#comment-418</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 14:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lloydi.com/blog/2006/04/13/simply-google-made-simpler/#comment-418</guid>
					<description>Simply Google is great...but I didn't notice Google's UncleSam search option.  http://www.google.com/unclesam  Is it there, or are you calling it something else?  

Thanks so much!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simply Google is great&#8230;but I didn&#8217;t notice Google&#8217;s UncleSam search option.  <a href='http://www.google.com/unclesam' rel='nofollow'>http://www.google.com/unclesam</a>  Is it there, or are you calling it something else?  </p>
<p>Thanks so much!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris McEvoy</title>
		<link>http://lloydi.com/blog/2006/04/13/simply-google-made-simpler/#comment-385</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 21:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lloydi.com/blog/2006/04/13/simply-google-made-simpler/#comment-385</guid>
					<description>I have added &quot;Feeling Lucky&quot; to searches and Calendar to sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have added &#8220;Feeling Lucky&#8221; to searches and Calendar to sites.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: librarianscott</title>
		<link>http://lloydi.com/blog/2006/04/13/simply-google-made-simpler/#comment-384</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 14:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lloydi.com/blog/2006/04/13/simply-google-made-simpler/#comment-384</guid>
					<description>Could you add Google's I'm Feeling Lucky search to this?

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you add Google&#8217;s I&#8217;m Feeling Lucky search to this?</p>
<p>Thanks.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lloydi</title>
		<link>http://lloydi.com/blog/2006/04/13/simply-google-made-simpler/#comment-382</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 11:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lloydi.com/blog/2006/04/13/simply-google-made-simpler/#comment-382</guid>
					<description>I did think of that, but then I wondered if that was adding too much in to the original. I know I could do what I liked, but I wanted to re-work Chris's original table layout to CSS without changing the view or functionality. Likewise I wondered about whether to only add tabindex for the search input elements and ignore the links, but in the end left as is. Not sure if I did the right thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did think of that, but then I wondered if that was adding too much in to the original. I know I could do what I liked, but I wanted to re-work Chris&#8217;s original table layout to CSS without changing the view or functionality. Likewise I wondered about whether to only add tabindex for the search input elements and ignore the links, but in the end left as is. Not sure if I did the right thing.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nick Harris</title>
		<link>http://lloydi.com/blog/2006/04/13/simply-google-made-simpler/#comment-381</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 10:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lloydi.com/blog/2006/04/13/simply-google-made-simpler/#comment-381</guid>
					<description>&quot;Should I have placed higher importance on the tab order or on the appearance of the page with no CSS?&quot;

How about using tabindexes on the text and submit inputs? Could be a little confusing for those who like to tab through everything, links and all... but there are likely more people who just tab through form elements* so it would make it easier on the majority

*disclaimer: I have absolutely no evidence to back this up ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Should I have placed higher importance on the tab order or on the appearance of the page with no CSS?&#8221;</p>
<p>How about using tabindexes on the text and submit inputs? Could be a little confusing for those who like to tab through everything, links and all&#8230; but there are likely more people who just tab through form elements* so it would make it easier on the majority</p>
<p>*disclaimer: I have absolutely no evidence to back this up ;)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
